home    about    browse    search    latest    help 
Login | Create Account

Lessons Learnt from Living Labs in Agri-Food Research

Oehen, Bernadette; Krauss, Maike; Burri, Milena and Bühl, Verena (2026) Lessons Learnt from Living Labs in Agri-Food Research. Poster at: Summit of the Agroecology Partnership's Network of Living Labs and Research Infratstructures, Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik und Bioökonomie (ATB), Potsdam, Germany, October 6, 2026. [Completed]

[thumbnail of Poster] PDF - English (Poster)
301kB


Summary

The poster presents lessons from three FiBL Living Lab (LL) projects covering strip cropping, pig rooting areas and dairy sheep lamb care. Based on researchers’ reflections and previous experience, it identifies common challenges and practical recommendations for implementing Living Labs in agricultural research.
The main message is that Living Labs are not always the best approach. They are particularly valuable for complex, context-dependent problems that require collaboration between researchers and stakeholders to develop solutions. For simpler technical questions, on-farm trials, demonstrations or peer-to-peer learning may be more effective.
Five key lessons
1. Choose the right approach. Assess whether the research problem is sufficiently complex to justify a Living Lab and whether stakeholders have a genuine interest in addressing it.
2. Involve stakeholders from the beginning. Research questions should reflect participants’ needs and remain flexible enough to accommodate their priorities.
3. Invest in trust and participation. Building relationships, agreeing on common goals and ensuring commitment take time. Skilled facilitation helps address power imbalances and ensures that all voices are heard.
4. Clarify roles and expectations. Living Labs involve both technical and social processes. Participants need a shared understanding of their responsibilities and who is expected to contribute to change.
5. Plan realistic timelines and funding. Establishing a functioning Living Lab often takes longer than anticipated in research proposals. Projects should allow sufficient time for initiation, demonstrate interim progress and consider continuity beyond the funding period.
Overall conclusion
The success of a Living Lab depends less on applying a particular methodology than on selecting the right problems, engaging the right people and providing sufficient time for collaboration. Researchers and funding organisations should recognise that relationship-building is an essential part of the research process, not simply a preliminary activity.


EPrint Type:Conference paper, poster, etc.
Type of presentation:Poster
Keywords:living labs, agroecology, Abacus, FiBL60102, FiBL90548, AGROECOLOGY
Agrovoc keywords:
Language
Value
URI
English
living labs
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_72847fa3
English
agroecology
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
Subjects: Food systems > Food security, food quality and human health
Food systems > Policy environments and social economy
Knowledge management > Education, extension and communication
Research affiliation: Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Knowledge exchange
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Society > Agri-food policy > Policy development
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Sustainability > Agroecology
European Union > Horizon Europe > AGROECOLOGY Partnership
Horizon Europe or H2020 Grant Agreement Number:101132349
Related Links:https://www.fibl.org/en/themes/projectdatabase/projectitem/project/2547
Deposited By: Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, FiBL
ID Code:58286
Deposited On:03 Nov 2026 10:32
Last Modified:03 Nov 2026 10:32
Document Language:English
Status:Unpublished
Refereed:Not peer-reviewed

Repository Staff Only: item control page