Chanev, Milen; Kamenova, Ilina; Dimitrov, Petar and Filchev, Lachezar (2025) Evaluation of Sentinel-2 Deep Resolution 3.0 Data for Winter Crop Identification and Organic Barley Yield Prediction. Remote Sensing, 17 (6), pp. 957-973.
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
- English
2MB |
Document available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/6/957#
Summary
Barley is an ecologically adaptable crop widely used in agriculture and well suited for organic farming. Satellite imagery from Sentinel-2 can support crop monitoring and yield prediction, optimising production processes. This study compares two types of Sentinel-2 data—standard (S2) data with 10 m and 20 m resolution and Sentinel-2 Deep Resolution 3 (S2DR3) data with 1 m resolution—to assess their (i) relationship with yield in organically grown barley and (ii) utility for winter crop mapping. Vegetation indices were generated and analysed across different phenological phases to determine the most suitable predictors of yield. The results indicate that using 10 × 10 m data, the BBCH-41 phase is optimal for yield prediction, with the Green Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (GCVI; r = 0.80) showing the strongest correlation with yield. In contrast, S2DR3 data with a 1 × 1 m resolution demonstrated that Transformed the Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index (TCARI), TO, and Normalised Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE1) were consistently reliable across all phenological stages, except for BBCH-51, which showed weak correlations. These findings highlight the potential of remote sensing in organic barley farming and emphasise the importance of selecting appropriate data resolutions and vegetation indices for accurate yield prediction. With the use of three-date spectral band stacks, the Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Classification (SVC) methods were used to differentiate between wheat, barley, and rapeseed. A five-fold cross-validation approach was applied, training data were stratified with 200 points per crop, and classification accuracy was assessed using the User’s and Producer’s accuracy metrics through pixel-by-pixel comparison with a reference raster. The results for S2 and S2DR3 were very similar to each other, confirming the significant potential of S2DR3 for high-resolution crop mapping.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

Download Statistics
Download Statistics
