Organic Eprints frontpage
 about    browse    search    register    user area    help 

768: Kann man bei der Nährstoffbilanzierung im ökologischen Anbau mit den üblichen Faustzahlen rechnen?

Raupp, Dr Joachim (2001) Kann man bei der Nährstoffbilanzierung im ökologischen Anbau mit den üblichen Faustzahlen rechnen?. Paper presented at 44. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften, Bonn, 27.-29. Sep. 2001, page pp. 246-247. Mitt. der Ges. f. Pflanzenbauwiss. 13.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Summary

Nutrient budgets are an important tool of farm planning. Normally the amounts of manure, feedstuffs, yields etc. as well as their nutrient contents are measured and analysed in each single case. If this is impossible for labour reasons, standard data sets of nutrient contents in agricultural products have to be used. However, these data sets have been determined in conventional farming. Thus, the question arises, whether theses results can be transferred to organically grown crops. This question was investigated with rye samples of a long-term trial with farmyard manure and mineral fertilization.
In many cases the N, P and K contents in organically and minerally fertilized samples differed significantly, though one of the treatments did not always show the higher or lower results. Manure fertilized rye had lower N contents in seeds and straw; the straw had more P but less K and higher ash contents than in the mineral treatment. It has to be concluded that miss-calculations in nutrient budgets are to be expected, if conventional values are used for organic products.

Document Language:Deutsch - German
Keywords:nutrient budgets, rye, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, ash content
Subject Areas: Soil > Nutrient turnover
Crop husbandry > Composting and manuring
Research affiliation: Germany > Institute for Biodynamic Research (IBDF)
Orgprints ID Number:768
Contact:Raupp, PhD Joachim
Deposited On:25 July 2005
EPrint Type:Conference paper
Published?:Published
Peer Review Status:Not peer-reviewed

Archive Staff Only: edit this record