home    about    browse    search    latest    help 
Login | Create Account

Evaluation of six phosphorus extraction methods for compliance testing of recycled P fertilizers

Hernandez-Mora, Al.; Duboc, O.; Bünemann, E. K.; Ylivainio, K.; Lombi, E.; Symanczik, S.; Horn, D.; Delgado, A.; Abu Zahra, N.; Zuin, L.; Doolette, C. L.; Eigner, H. and Santner, J. (2025) Evaluation of six phosphorus extraction methods for compliance testing of recycled P fertilizers. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 37 (103913), pp. 1-15.

[thumbnail of 2025_Hernandez-Mora P fertilizer extractions.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version - English
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

4MB

Document available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003894


Summary

Phosphorus (P) recycling for fertilizer production addresses the dependency on phosphate rock and mitigates P losses to the environment. However, predicting plant-available P in recycled fertilizers is challenging due to their diverse chemical composition. This study aimed at identifying the most suitable P extraction method for fertilizer compliance testing, considering their correlation with actual fertilization efficiency, as well as their simplicity, throughput, recognition and cost. Studies on fertilizer P compliance testing often lack recommendations on minimum P extractability threshold values. Here, thresholds are calculated based on actual fertilization efficiency of a large, chemically diverse set of recycled P fertilizers, many of which are already marketed. Thirty recycled P fertilizers were extracted with H2O, neutral ammonium citrate (NAC), electro-ultrafiltration (EUF), ferrihydrite-filled membranes (iron bag; IB), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). The mineral replacement value (MRV) of the fertilizer set was previously evaluated in three pot experiments at a fertilization rate of 50 mg kg− 1 soil. MRV correlations with the extractions methods showed similar results for all besides H2O, which cannot be a reliable indicator for P availability. Fertilizers were classified as efficient or inefficient based on their MRV exceeding or falling below 60 % of the triple superphosphate reference value. The minimum P extractability threshold value (MPETV) for each method was based on the efficiency classification and it minimized the number of misclassified fertilizers. NAC, with a 60 % extractable minimum P threshold value, was the most adequate method for compliance testing, despite its overestimation of iron phosphate availability


EPrint Type:Journal paper
Keywords:Recycled fertilizer, Compliance testing, Phosphorus extraction, Neutral ammonium citrate, Fertilization efficiency, Nutrient availability, Abacus, FiBL1012803, Lex4Bio
Agrovoc keywords:
Language
Value
URI
English
phosphate fertilizers
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5800
English
nutrient availability (soil)
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37554
Subjects: Crop husbandry > Composting and manuring
Soil > Nutrient turnover
Environmental aspects > Air and water emissions
Research affiliation: Spain > University of Sevilla
Austria > Univ. BOKU Wien
Canada
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Crops > Composting and fertilizer application > Nitrogen
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Soil > Nutrient management
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Crops > Composting and fertilizer application > Plant nutrition
Germany > University of Gießen > Institute of Plant Nutrition
European Union > Horizon 2020 > LEX4BIO
Germany > Other organizations Germany
Austria > Other organizations Austria
Finland > Other organizations Finland
Australia > Other organizations Australia
Horizon Europe or H2020 Grant Agreement Number:818309
DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103913
Related Links:https://www.fibl.org/en/themes/projectdatabase/projectitem/project/1693
Deposited By: Ellenberger, Maura
ID Code:56653
Deposited On:28 Jan 2026 13:17
Last Modified:28 Jan 2026 13:39
Document Language:English
Status:Published
Refereed:Peer-reviewed and accepted

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics