home    about    browse    search    latest    help 
Login | Create Account

Effects of twice a day teat bucket feeding compared to twice a day mother suckling on behaviour, health traits and blood immune parameters in dairy calves and immune parameters in cow's milk

Bieber, Anna; Walkenhorst, Michael; Eppenstein, Rennie; Probst, Johanna; Leiber, Florian; Thüer, Susann; Baki, Cem and Spengler Neff, Anet (2022) Effects of twice a day teat bucket feeding compared to twice a day mother suckling on behaviour, health traits and blood immune parameters in dairy calves and immune parameters in cow's milk. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 252 (105644), pp. 1-11.

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of Bieber et al. 2022.pdf] PDF - Published Version - English
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

673kB

Document available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159122001022?via%3Dihub


Summary

Early separation of cow and calf is still common practice in dairy production systems, but interest in calf rearing with cow contact has been constantly increasing in recent years. We tested the hypothesis that calves suckling their mothers twice a day would benefit with regard to behaviour and health traits until four months of age, when compared to twice daily teat bucket fed calves, fed with comparable milk amounts. Moreover, the effect of calf contact beyond the colostrum period on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and lactoferrin content in cow’s milk was investigated in weeks 3, 8, 12 and 16 post partum. We conducted on-farm trials on two organic farms from 2018 to 2020, where we randomly assigned the new born calves by sex and parity status of the mother (primi- or multiparous) to either teat bucket feeding (BF, n = 30 cow-calf couples, 2 ×3–5 L/d warmed bulk milk) or mother suckling (MS, n = 28 cow-calf couples, 2 ×30 min contact after milking). MS calves performed less cross-sucking, but manipulations of objects did not differ between feeding treatments nor did avoidance distance towards humans. Clinical scores on vitality, body condition, indicators for diarrhoea and respiratory disorders, and number of medical treatments differed between farms, but not between feeding treatments. Lactate level (stress indicator) revealed contradictory results between farms (farm 1: BF>MS, farm 2: BF≤MS). Glucose content (indicator of energy level) and packed cell volume (low values indicating anaemia) were higher in MS compared to BF calves. No difference between feeding treatments was found with regard to the immune status indicators mean total protein and IgG content in calf serum. Consistently, average IgG content in cow’s milk did not differ between cows with or without calf contact and showed a clear decrease with time. The variability of lactoferrin content in milk was higher in cows with calf contact, but its average did not differ between feeding treatments nor did it change with time. We conclude that even part-time mother contact twice daily is a means to reduce abnormal behaviour, i.e. cross-sucking, as it satisfies sucking needs of calves better than teat bucket feeding. Although health traits did mostly not differ between feeding treatments, differences between farms underline the influence of management factors on calf health. Cow-calf contact twice daily had no effect on the build-up of the active immune defence until the age of four months.


EPrint Type:Journal paper
Keywords:cow-calf contact, dam rearing, Abacus, FiBL50090, ProYoungStock
Agrovoc keywords:
Language
Value
URI
English
calf feeding
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9bf4fb86
English
welfare
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331043
English
behaviour
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_868
Subjects: Animal husbandry > Production systems > Beef cattle
Animal husbandry > Feeding and growth
Animal husbandry > Health and welfare
Research affiliation: European Union > CORE Organic Cofund > ProYoungStock
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Animal > Animal welfare & housing > Animal husbandry
Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Animal > Animal welfare & housing > Animal welfare
France > INRAe - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement
H2020 or FP7 Grant Agreement Number:727495
ISSN:0168-1591
DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105644
Related Links:https://www.proyoungstock.net/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105644
Deposited By: Bieber, Anna
ID Code:44063
Deposited On:20 May 2022 07:17
Last Modified:20 May 2022 07:17
Document Language:English
Status:Published
Refereed:Peer-reviewed and accepted

Available Versions of this Item

Repository Staff Only: item control page