home    about    browse    search    latest    help 
Login | Create Account

Nitrogen balances in organic and conventional arable crop rotations and their relations to nitrogen yield and nitrate leaching losses

Pandey, Arjun; Li, Fucui; Askegaard, Margrethe; Rasmussen, Ilse A. and Olesen, Jørgen E. (2018) Nitrogen balances in organic and conventional arable crop rotations and their relations to nitrogen yield and nitrate leaching losses. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 265, pp. 350-362.

[thumbnail of Nitrogen balances in organic and conventional arable crop rotations andtheir relations to nitrogen yield and nitrate leaching losses.pdf] PDF - Published Version - English
Limited to [Depositor and staff only]



Nitrogen (N) flows in organic cropping systems differ considerably from those in conventional systems. The difference is particularly due to the N in organic materials in organic systems as opposed to the mineral N in fertilizer in conventional systems, which differently affect crop N supply and N losses. This implies different responses of conventional and organic cropping systems to N inputs and N management. Therefore, N flow dynamics were studied in a range of arable cropping systems with 4-year crop rotations at three different sites in Denmark varying in soil (coarse sand, loamy sand and sandy loam) and climatic conditions. The long-term field experiments included an incomplete factorial combination of (1) rotations with grass-clover in organic farming (OGC) or grain legumes in organic farming (OGL) or conventionally managed (CGL) systems, (2) with (+CC) and without (−CC) cover crops, and (3) with (+M) and without (−M) animal manure (in OGC and OGL), and with (+F) mineral fertilizer (in CGL). Cover crops in OGC and OGL included a mixture of perennial ryegrass and clover (at the sites with coarse sand and sandy loam soils) or winter rye, fodder radish and vetch (at the site with loamy sand soil), and cover crops in CGL included only perennial ryegrass at all the sites. Higher N input and N output was observed in CGL compared to OGC and OGL. The differences in annual N output in cash crops between CGL and OGL, and CGL and OGC after accounting for effects of differences in N inputs were 15 and 27 kg N/ha, respectively. The N output was related to N input, with a higher response to mineral N in both fertilizer and manure than to biological N fixation (BNF). The N surplus (difference between N input and N output) was significantly lower in OGL/−M+CC compared with other treatments. The recycled N in aboveground plant residues was highest in OGC/−M+CC where grass-clover cuttings were left in the field, followed by +CC treatments in OGL and CGL. The response of nitrate-N leaching to N input depended on soil type and precipitation, and leaching was reduced by the use of cover crops. The nitrate-N leaching increased with increasing N input at rates of 0.13–0.22 kg N/kg N input, and it increased with increasing N surplus at rates of 0.21–0.27 kg N/kg N surplus.

EPrint Type:Journal paper
Keywords:Nitrogen fertilizer, legumes, nitrogen fixation, mimosaceae, nitrogen flow, organic fertilizer, phosphatic fertilizer
Agrovoc keywords:
nitrogen fixation
cropping systems
nitrogen cycle
organic farming -> organic agriculture
organic fertilizers
Subjects: Crop husbandry > Crop combinations and interactions
Soil > Nutrient turnover
Crop husbandry > Soil tillage
Environmental aspects > Air and water emissions
Farming Systems > Farm nutrient management
Research affiliation: Denmark > DARCOF III (2005-2010) > CROPSYS - The effect of cropping systems on production and the environment
Denmark > Organic RDD 1 > HighCrop
Denmark > AU - Aarhus University > Faculty of Science and Technology > Department of Agroecology
Denmark > ICROFS - International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems
Denmark > SEGES
Denmark > CROPSYS
H2020 or FP7 Grant Agreement Number:245216
Related Links:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918302287?via%3Dihub
Deposited By: Rasmussen, Ilse Ankjær
ID Code:42370
Deposited On:21 Dec 2021 13:24
Last Modified:06 Jun 2022 15:58
Document Language:English
Refereed:Peer-reviewed and accepted

Repository Staff Only: item control page