Blockeel, Johan; Chuluunbaatar, Delfermaa; Holley, Aiden; Sulaiman, Rasheed; Djamen, Pactrice and Grovermann, Christian (2023) Taking a snapshot of Extension and Advisory Systems performance and outcomes: insights on a semi-quantitative evaluation approach. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29 (4), pp. 489-509.
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
- Published Version
- English
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 2MB |
Document available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2089178
Summary
Purpose
To evaluate pluralistic Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) systems performance and outcomes, and share the experiences made with applying a participatory semi-quantitative approach allowing for cross-country comparability.
Design/methodology/approach
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) developed the ‘Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) System – Yardstick’ (EAS-Y), a semi-quantitative assessment approach relying on expert-based scores to evaluate the EAS system performance on the one hand, and users’ scores to measure the system outcomes on the other. The tool was applied in three countries, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Peru.
Findings
Results revealed an overall weak performance on most assessed criteria. Experts pointed out a lack of adequate policies addressing agricultural extension, insufficient funding, and poor infrastructure. On the other hand, the increased focus on sustainability, increased inclusiveness levels, and steady uptake of digitalization technologies are areas where progress was recently made. On the outcomes side, users perceived EAS contributed mainly to acquiring technical skills, while less to entrepreneurial and social skills.
Practical Implications
EAS-Y represented a user-friendly and cost-effective solution to identify performance gaps and assess outcomes in a semi-quantitative way. Therefore, we consider the latter has the potential to be applied to prioritize areas for intervention and guide decision-making processes.
Theoretical implications
The commonly existing data gap not allowing for a quantitative evaluation of pluralistic EAS systems can be overcome using a participatory evaluation tool that relies on expert and user’s judgments.
Originality/Value
We used an innovative evaluation approach to assess pluralistic extension systems in three Latin American countries.
EPrint Type: | Journal paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | pluralistic extension and advisory systems, participatory evaluation, semiquanitative approach, Latin America, Abacus, FiBL35185 |
Agrovoc keywords: | Language Value URI English evaluation http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 English advisory services http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8631 English Latin America http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4221 |
Subjects: | Food systems > Policy environments and social economy Knowledge management > Education, extension and communication |
Research affiliation: | Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Society > Agri-food policy |
DOI: | 10.1080/1389224X.2022.2089178 |
Related Links: | https://www.fibl.org/en/themes/projectdatabase/projectitem/project/1687 |
Deposited By: | Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, FiBL |
ID Code: | 51822 |
Deposited On: | 17 Oct 2023 12:09 |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2023 12:09 |
Document Language: | English |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Peer-reviewed and accepted |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Taking a snapshot of Extension and Advisory Systems performance and outcomes: insights on a semi-quantitative evaluation approach. (deposited 23 Nov 2022 10:29)
- Taking a snapshot of Extension and Advisory Systems performance and outcomes: insights on a semi-quantitative evaluation approach. (deposited 17 Oct 2023 12:09) [Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only: item control page