home    about    browse    search    latest    help 
Login | Create Account

Taking a snapshot of Extension and Advisory Systems performance and outcomes: insights on a semi-quantitative evaluation approach

Blockeel, Johan; Chuluunbaatar, Delfermaa; Holley, Aiden; Sulaiman, Rasheed; Djamen, Pactrice and Grovermann, Christian (2022) Taking a snapshot of Extension and Advisory Systems performance and outcomes: insights on a semi-quantitative evaluation approach. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, online, pp. 1-22.

Warning
There is a more recent version of this item available.

[thumbnail of blockell-etal-2022-JAgriculturalEducationExtension-online-p1-22.pdf] PDF - English
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

2MB

Document available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2089178


Summary

Purpose
To evaluate pluralistic Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) systems performance and outcomes, and share the experiences made with applying a participatory semi-quantitative approach allowing for cross-country comparability.
Design/methodology/approach
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) developed the ‘Extension and Advisory Services (EAS) System – Yardstick’ (EAS-Y), a semi-quantitative assessment approach relying on expert-based scores to evaluate the EAS system performance on the one hand, and users’ scores to measure the system outcomes on the other. The tool was applied in three countries, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Peru.
Findings
Results revealed an overall weak performance on most assessed criteria. Experts pointed out a lack of adequate policies addressing agricultural extension, insufficient funding, and poor infrastructure. On the other hand, the increased focus on sustainability, increased inclusiveness levels, and steady uptake of digitalization technologies are areas where progress was recently made. On the outcomes side, users perceived EAS contributed mainly to acquiring technical skills, while less to entrepreneurial and social skills.
Practical Implications
EAS-Y represented a user-friendly and cost-effective solution to identify performance gaps and assess outcomes in a semi-quantitative way. Therefore, we consider the latter has the potential to be applied to prioritize areas for intervention and guide decision-making processes.
Theoretical implications
The commonly existing data gap not allowing for a quantitative evaluation of pluralistic EAS systems can be overcome using a participatory evaluation tool that relies on expert and user’s judgments.
Originality/Value
We used an innovative evaluation approach to assess pluralistic extension systems in three Latin American countries.


EPrint Type:Journal paper
Keywords:pluralistic extension and advisory systems, participatory evaluation, semiquanitative approach, Latin America, Abacus, FiBL35185
Agrovoc keywords:
Language
Value
URI
English
evaluation
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
English
advisory services
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8631
English
Latin America
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4221
Subjects: Food systems > Policy environments and social economy
Knowledge management > Education, extension and communication
Research affiliation: Switzerland > FiBL - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland > Society > Agri-food policy
DOI:10.1080/1389224X.2022.2089178
Related Links:https://www.fibl.org/en/themes/projectdatabase/projectitem/project/1687
Deposited By: Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, FiBL
ID Code:44669
Deposited On:23 Nov 2022 10:29
Last Modified:23 Nov 2022 10:29
Document Language:English
Status:Published
Refereed:Peer-reviewed and accepted

Available Versions of this Item

Repository Staff Only: item control page