Vaarst, Mette and Roderick, Stephen (2009) Implementation of farmer groups for animal health and welfare planning considering different contexts. In: Vaarst, Mette and Roderick, Stephen (Eds.) CORE Organic project nr: 1903 - Aniplan. Workshop report - The process of researching animal health and welfare planning. Core Organic project Series, no. 1903-2. Aarhus Universitet - Faculty of Agricultural Sciences , Departement of Animal Health and Bioscience, pp. 34-36.
PDF
- English
317kB |
Document available online at: http://aniplan.coreportal.org/gfx/ANIPLAN-proceedings-2-Norway.pdf
Summary
This paper reflects some of the discussions that took place during the ANIPLAN workshop where participants discussed the special farming and farmer characteristics, needs and conditions in their own country in relation to farmer discussion groups, as well as more generic issues to consider when taking a farmer group approach to animal health and welfare planning.
Farmer discussion groups are not unique, and there are examples of different approaches to, and aims of, farmer groups worldwide. Perhaps an important starting point when analysing the successes and characteristics of these groups is to consider their original purpose. The starting point of the discussion in the ANIPLAN project has been the so-called Danish Stable Schools (Vaarst et al., 2007; Vaarst et al. 2008; mentioned in Vaarst ibid.), as well as existing approaches within the other participating countries, such as the Dutch Caring Dairy groups (Smolders, ibid.). A major feature of the Danish Stable Schools has been the time limited intensive working towards a common goal based around equal participation within the group. This is quite a different approach to other examples, such as the so-called ‘erfa-groups’ in Denmark (‘erfa’ as an abbreviation of ‘erfaring’, which in Danish means ‘experience’) that have worked for decades on dissemination of new knowledge and ideas to and among farmers, focusing on separate themes at each meeting, such as approaches to parasite control, winter feeding strategies, or the use of body condition scores. Similar focused dissemination programmes exist in many countries. What characterises the ANIPLAN project is that the focus is on a rather more systematic animal health and welfare planning process which is meant to be continuous at the farm level.
EPrint Type: | Report chapter |
---|---|
Keywords: | aniplan |
Subjects: | Food systems > Food security, food quality and human health Animal husbandry > Health and welfare Animal husbandry > Breeding and genetics Animal husbandry > Feeding and growth |
Research affiliation: | European Union > CORE Organic > ANIPLAN Denmark > ICROFS - International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems |
Related Links: | http://aniplan.coreportal.org/gfx/ANIPLAN-proceedings-2-Norway.pdf |
Deposited By: | Holme, Ms. Mette |
ID Code: | 15920 |
Deposited On: | 29 Jul 2009 |
Last Modified: | 12 Apr 2010 07:39 |
Document Language: | English |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Not peer-reviewed |
Repository Staff Only: item control page