<mets:mets OBJID="oai:orgprints.org:9331" LABEL="Eprints Item" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATA="2010-03-22T14:12:59Z"><mets:agent TYPE="ORGANIZATION" ROLE="CUSTODIAN"><mets:name>Organic Eprints</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_oai:orgprints.org:9331_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="mods"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>WELFARE, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITATIVE TRAITS OF EGG IN LAYING HENS REARED UNDER DIFFERENT REARING SYSTEMS</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">C</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">CASTELLINI</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">F</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">PERELLA</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">C</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">MUGNAI</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">A</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">DAL BOSCO</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The welfare, production performance and some qualitative characteristics of eggs obtained under three different rearing systems (conventional, organic and organic-plus) were compared. Three homogeneous groups, each of 120 White Leghorn hens, fed the same diets, were assigned to different rearing systems and data were recorded for 1 year. The welfare indicators were the following: first impact, behavioural patterns, tonic immobility and plumage status. Productive performance was recorded (% deposition; egg weight) and some qualitative traits (Haugh index, yolk colour, yolk, albumen and egg shell weight) were evaluated. Well-being was greatly affected by rearing system. The best welfare status was observed in hens of the organic-plus group, whereas the worst was in the conventional group (caged hens). Caged hens showed little interest or fear of observers, at times they had high tonic immobility and some aggressive pecking; the status of their plumage was very poor. On the contrary, caged hens produced more eggs, even if their qualitative traits (Haugh index and yolk colour) were worse than the organicplus eggs. The intense motor activity of organic hens and the concurrent intake of grass reduced their productive level; further egg deposition seemed more affected by seasonal variation.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc"> Poultry</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc"> Health and welfare</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2006</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>WRSA</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Conference paper, poster, etc. </mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_oai:orgprints.org:9331"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_oai:orgprints.org:9331_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="mods"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>Deposit Agreement</strong></p> 
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">In depositing this eprint (a collection of files and associated bibliographic 
metadata), I grant Organic Eprints the right to make 
it permanently available on-line, with open access to all or in accordance 
with any access restrictions that I have specified. (Removal of eprints from the 
public archive is strongly discouraged, but will be granted upon request.)<br /> 
I understand that Organic Eprints does not assume any responsibility 
if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these 
files or metadata.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own first author:</strong> 
I declare that this eprint is my own intellectual property and that I have 
the right to make it available in Organic Eprints in the manner chosen.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its first
author:</strong> I declare that I have gained the proper permissions
from someone with the right to make this eprint available in Organic Eprints 
in the manner chosen - or that the material is in the public domain.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these 
terms. If you do not wish to deposit the eprint right now you can 
<a href="http://orgprints.org/perl/users/myhome">return to your user area</a>, where you will find 
this eprint in your workspace. You can then later edit, clone and deposit it.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec><mets:fileGrp USE="reference"><mets:file SIZE="69035" ID="oai:orgprints.org:9331_6929_1" MIMETYPE="application/octet-stream" OWNERID="http://orgprints.org/9331/1/Welfare,_productivity_and_qualitative_traits_of_egg.pdf"><mets:FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" xlink:href="http://orgprints.org/9331/1/Welfare,_productivity_and_qualitative_traits_of_egg.pdf" xlink:type="simple"></mets:FLocat></mets:file></mets:fileGrp></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div DMDID="DMD_oai:orgprints.org:9331_mods" AMDID="TMD_oai:orgprints.org:9331"><mets:fptr FILEID="oai:orgprints.org:9331_6929_1"></mets:fptr></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>