  <eprint id="http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/8381" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>8381</eprintid>
    <rev_number>1</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>4832</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/83/81</dir>
    <datestamp>2006-10-17</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2009-08-20 14:32:21</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2009-08-20 14:32:21</status_changed>
    <type>conference_item</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <doclang>en</doclang>
    <projects>
      <item>uk</item>
      <item>uk-efrc</item>
      <item>uk-cor-2002</item>
      <item>uk-aberystwyth-rural-studies</item>
    </projects>
    <confdates>26-28 March 2002</confdates>
    <conference>UK Organic Research 2002 Conference</conference>
    <confloc>Aberystwyth</confloc>
    <refereed>never</refereed>
    <budget>0</budget>
    <publicfulltext>TRUE</publicfulltext>
    <presentationtype>paper</presentationtype>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Fowler</family>
          <given>Susan M</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Philipps</family>
          <given>Lois</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Watson</family>
          <given>Christine A</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>Carrot or stick? – Would information concerning the economic value of nutrient losses, and their impact on food quality achieve greater environmental protection than regulation?</title>
    <ispublished>pub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>2farming</item>
      <item>farm_nutrient_management</item>
    </subjects>
    <keywords>Colloquium of Organic Researchers; COR; nutrient loss; farmyard manure; financial costs; environmental costs; nutrient management</keywords>
    <abstract>This report was presented at the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference. Organic standards have, since their origin (Soil Association 1967) required high standards of manure management, but in reality, these have not been implemented, possibly because of perceived costs of improved handling. However, a cost/benefit analysis of intermediate steps of nutrient conservation and manure handling may provide a practical solution, optimising retention of nutrients, financial and time inputs and environmental protection. Recent research on composting with conventional manures has quantified nutrient losses from heaps with different treatments (Parkinson et al, 2001). Financial and environmental costs and benefits of different management approaches are discussed.</abstract>
    <date>2002</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <publication>Proceedings of the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference</publication>
    <publisher>Organic Centre Wales, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth</publisher>
    <editors>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Powell</family>
          <given>Jane</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>et al.</family>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </editors>
    <referencetext>ADAS (2001) Managing Manure on Organic Farms. EFRC, Newbury and ADAS, Notts &#13;
MAFF Modelling Nitrogen and Phosphorus utilisation in dairy cows. Final report to MAFF. http://www.defra.gov.uk /research/Projects/Reports\PDF\WA0311.pdf &#13;
Organic Farmers and Growers (2001) Organic assurance scheme control Manual, Shrewsbury. &#13;
Parkinson et al. (2001) Enhancing the effective utilisation of animal manures on-farm through compost technology. Final report to MAFF. available at http://www.defra.gov.uk /research/Projects/Reports\PDF\WA0519.pdf &#13;
Shepherd M.; Cuttle S; Gosling P; Harrison R; Johnson B; Rayns F (2000). Understanding soil fertility in organically farmed soils. available at www.adas.co.uk. &#13;
Stockdale E.A; Conway JS; Fortune S; Philipps L; Robinson JS; Watson, C.A .(2000). Optimisation of phosphorus and potassium management within organic farming systems. Final DEFRA Project Report OF0114. &#13;
Soil Association (1967). Mother Earth, Soil Association &#13;
Soil Association (1999) Standards for Organic Food and Farming. Bristol. &#13;
Tame M (2001) The Changing Protein Content of Grass/clover swards in Elm Farm Research Centre Bulletin. 55. Newbury &#13;
Weller RF; Cooper. A., (2001) Seasonal changes in the crude protein concentration of mixed swards of white clover/perennial ryegrass grown without fertilizer N in an organic farming system in the U K. Grass and Forage Science, 56, 92-95 &#13;
MAFF (1998a) The air code. MAFF: London. &#13;
MAFF (1998b) The soil code. MAFF: London. &#13;
MAFF (1998c) The water code. MAFF: London. &#13;
UKROFS (2001) Standards for Organic Food Production. UK Register of Organic Food Standards: London.</referencetext>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <pagerange>133-136</pagerange>
    <documents>
      <document id="http://orgprints.org/id/document/6232" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>6232</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>8381</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>fowler_Carrot_nutrient_losses.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>fowler_Carrot_nutrient_losses.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>224331</filesize>
            <url>http://orgprints.org/8381/1/fowler_Carrot_nutrient_losses.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
