  <eprint id="http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/6422" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>6422</eprintid>
    <rev_number>1</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>3892</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/64/22</dir>
    <datestamp>2007-04-04</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2009-08-20 14:29:00</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2009-08-20 14:29:00</status_changed>
    <type>conference_item</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <engabstract>Ensiled barley was compared with dried barley as the only concentrate for cows in organic farming. Milk production has been moderate in the group with 40% concentrates and low in the group with 10% concentrates. Both drying and ensiling preserved barley well, but there were small amounts of fungus on top of bags with ensiled barley. Both concentrates had about the same effect on total feed intake and production. It was observed that the palatability of barley was too low when given in higher amounts. The protein content in barley was too low when it was given as the only concentrate with silage, which also had low protein content.</engabstract>
    <doclang>no</doclang>
    <projects>
      <item>no-Planteforsk</item>
      <item>no-UMB</item>
    </projects>
    <confdates>7-8. February 2005</confdates>
    <conference>Husdyrforsøksmøtet 2005</conference>
    <confloc>Quality Hotel, Sarpsborg, Norway</confloc>
    <refereed>never</refereed>
    <budget>0</budget>
    <addtitle>Dried or ensiled barley for cows in organic farming</addtitle>
    <altloc>
      <item>http://www.planteforsk.no/ViewPPP.aspx?view=project&amp;id=386&amp;viewLanguage=NorwegianBokmaal</item>
    </altloc>
    <publicfulltext>TRUE</publicfulltext>
    <presentationtype>paper</presentationtype>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Adler</family>
          <given>Steffen A.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Randby</family>
          <given>Åshild T.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>Tørket eller ensilert bygg til kyr i økologisk landbruk</title>
    <ispublished>pub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>8planthealth</item>
      <item>3feeding</item>
    </subjects>
    <keywords>Dairy, dried barley, ensiled barley, Norway, melkeproduksjon, tørket bygg, ensilert bygg, Nord-Norge, NORTHDAIRY</keywords>
    <abstract>Ensilert bygg ble sammenlignet med tørket bygg som eneste kraftfôr til melkekyr i økologisk landbruk. Melkeproduksjonen har vært moderat i gruppen med 40% kraftfôr og lav i gruppen med 10% kraftfôr. Både tørking og ensilering konserverte bygget godt, med antydning til mugg på toppen av sekker med det ensilerte. Begge fôrslag hadde omtrent samme virkning på fôropptak og produksjon. Det har vist seg at bygg alene er for lite smakelig når det gis større mengder. Proteininnholdet i bygg var for lavt når det ble gitt som eneste kraftfôr til et surfôr med lavt proteininnhold.</abstract>
    <date>2005</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <publication>Husdyrforsøksmøtet 2005</publication>
    <editors>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Kaurstad</family>
          <given>Elin Kristine</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </editors>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <pagerange>427-430</pagerange>
    <documents>
      <document id="http://orgprints.org/id/document/5139" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>5139</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>6422</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>HFM_2005_108.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>HFM_2005_108.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>119297</filesize>
            <url>http://orgprints.org/6422/1/HFM_2005_108.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
