{
  "eprintid": "6007",
  "rev_number": "1",
  "eprint_status": "archive",
  "userid": "3559",
  "dir": "disk0/00/00/60/07",
  "datestamp": "2005-10-05",
  "lastmod": "2009-08-20 14:28:15",
  "status_changed": "2009-08-20 14:28:15",
  "type": "journalp",
  "metadata_visibility": "show",
  "item_issues_count": "0",
  "doclang": "en",
  "projects": [
    "kvl",
    "dk_ku",
    "dk_risoe",
    "dk_soar"
  ],
  "refereed": "yes",
  "budget": "0",
  "publicfulltext": "FALSE",
  "creators": [
    {
      "name": {
        "family": "Andersen",
        "given": "N.S."
      },
      "id": ""
    },
    {
      "name": {
        "family": "Siegismund",
        "given": "H.R."
      },
      "id": ""
    },
    {
      "name": {
        "family": "Meyer",
        "given": "V."
      },
      "id": ""
    },
    {
      "name": {
        "family": "Jørgensen",
        "given": "R.B."
      },
      "id": ""
    }
  ],
  "title": "Low level of gene flow from cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) into Danish populations of sea beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima (L.) Arcangeli)",
  "ispublished": "pub",
  "subjects": [
    "environment",
    "7biodiversity"
  ],
  "keywords": "genetic variation, hybridization, introgression, microsatellite, SSR",
  "abstract": "Gene flow from sugar beets to sea beets occurs in the seed propagation areas in southern Europe. Some seed propagation also takes place in Denmark, but here the crop–wild gene flow has not been investigated. Hence, we studied gene flow to sea beet populations from sugar beet lines used in Danish seed propagation areas. A set of 12 Danish, two Swedish, one French, one Italian, one Dutch, and one Irish populations of sea beets, and four lines of sugar beet were analysed. To evaluate the genetic variation and gene flow, eight microsatellite loci were screened. This analysis revealed hybridization with cultivated beet in one of the sea beet populations from the centre of the Danish seed propagation area. Triploid hybrids found in this population were verified with flow cytometry. Possible hybrids or introgressed plants were also found in the French and Italian populations. However, individual assignment test using a Bayesian method provided 100 % assignment success of diploid individuals into their correct subspecies of origin, and a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MC MC) approach revealed clear distinction of individuals into groups according to their subspecies of origin, with a zero level of genetic admixture among subspecies. This underlines that introgression beyond the first hybridization is not extensive. The overall pattern of genetic distance and structure showed that Danish and Swedish sea beet populations were closely related to each other, and they are both more closely related to the population from Ireland than to the populations from France, the Netherlands, and Italy.",
  "date": "2005-01",
  "date_type": "published",
  "publication": "Molecular Ecology",
  "volume": "14",
  "referencetext": "Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J et al. (1999) Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1733–1741. Bornscheuer E, Meyerholz K, Wunderlich KH (1993) Seed production and quality. In: The Sugar Beet Crop (eds Cooke DA, Scott RK ), pp. 121–155. Chapman & Hall, London. Bosemark N (1993) Genetics and plant breeding. In: The Sugar Beet Crop (eds Cooke DA Scott RK), pp. 67–119. Chapman & Hall, London. Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet PH, Van Dijk H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 87, 471–478. Brookfield JFY (1996) Technical note: a simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Molecular Ecology, 5, 453–455. Brun L, Haldrup A, Petersen SG et al. (1995) Self-incompatibility reactions in wild species of the genus Beta and their relation to taxonomical classification and geographical origin. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 42, 293–301. Callen DF, Thompson AD, Shen Y et al. (1993) Incidence and origin of ‘null’ alleles in the (AC) n microsatellite markers. American Journal of Human Genetics, 52, 922–927. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G et al. (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153, 1989–2000. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity, 93, 504–509. Desplanque B, Boudry P, Broomberg K et al. (1999) Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 98, 1194–1201. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) DNA isolation from leaves. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11–15. Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Environmental Issue Report no. 28, 75 pp. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 539–563. Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Gliddon C (1994) The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: biological models and theoretical perspectives. Molecular Ecology, 3, 41–44. Hansen MM, Kenchington E, Nielsen EE (2001) Assigning individual fish to populations using microsatellite DNA markers. Fish and Fisheries, 2, 93–112. Hansen A, Pedersen A (1968) Chenopodiaceernes og Amaranthaceernes udbredelse i Danmark: Beta maritima L. — Strand-Bede. Botaniske Tidsskrift, 63, 222–225. Hedrick PW (1999) Genetics of Populations, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts. LI-COR, Inc, Biotechnology Division, 4308 Progressive Avenue Lincolm NE, 68504 USA. Jonsell B (ed.) (2001) Flora Nordica. vol. 2. Bergius Foundation, Stockholm. Kraft T, Friedlund B, Hjerdin A et al. (1997) Estimating genetic variation in sugar beets and wild beets using pools of individuals. Genome, 40, 527–533. Kubiak-Martens L (1999) The plant food component of the diet at the late Mesolithic (Ertebølle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 8, 117–127. Levene H (1949) On a matching problem arising in genetics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 91–94. Levin DA, Francisco-Ortega J, Jansen RK (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conservation Biology, 10, 10–16. Longden PC (1976) Annual beet: problems and prospects. Pesticide Science, 7, 422–425. Michalakis Y, Excoffier L (1996) A generic estimation of population subdivision using distance between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics, 142, 1061–1064. Mörchen M, Cuguen C, Michaelis G, Hänni C, Saumitou-Laprade P (1996) Abundance and length polymorphism of microsatellite repeats in Beta vulgaris L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 92, 326–333. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 19, 153–170. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly PJ (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945–959. Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Aldam C et al. (1998) The genetic structure of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations. III. Detection of isolation by distance at microsatellite loci. Heredity, 80, 127–132. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248–249. genepop web version 3.1c available at http://wbiomed.curtin.edu.au/genepop/. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223–225. Schneider S, Roessli R, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN: a software for population genetics data analysis Version 2000. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland. Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Genetic distance and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics, 144, 389–399. Tjebbes K (1933) The wild beets of the North Sea region. Botanical Notiser, 305–315. Van Dijk H, Boudry P, McCombie H, Vernet P (1997) Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta Ecologica, 18, 47–60. Van Geyt JPC, Lange W, De Bock ThSM (1990) Natural variation within the genus Beta and its possible use for breeding sugar beet: a review. Euphytica, 49, 57–76. Viard F, Bernard J, Desplanque B (2002) Crop–weed interactions in Beta vulgaris complex at a local scale: allelic diversity and gene flow within sugar beet fields. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104, 688–697. Viard F, Arnaud JF, Delescluse M, Cuguen J (2004) Tracking back seed and pollen flow within the crop–wild Beta vulgaris complex: genetic distinctiveness vs. hot spots of hybridization over a regional scale. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1357–1364. Wattier R, Engel CR, Saumitou-Laprade P, Valero M (1998) Short allele dominance as a source of heterozygote defiency at microsatellite loci: experimental evidence at the dinucleotide locus Gv1CT in Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta). Molecular Ecology, 7, 1569–1573. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistic for the analyses of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.",
  "full_text_status": "restricted",
  "pagerange": "1391-1405",
  "documents": [
    {
      "docid": "4950",
      "rev_number": "1",
      "eprintid": "6007",
      "pos": "1",
      "format": "application/pdf",
      "language": "en",
      "security": "staffonly",
      "main": "6007.pdf",
      "files": [
        {
          "filename": "6007.pdf",
          "filesize": "402349",
          "url": "http://orgprints.org/6007/1/6007.pdf"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}