<mets:mets OBJID="oai:orgprints.org:5303" LABEL="Eprints Item" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATA="2009-11-26T07:08:01Z"><mets:agent TYPE="ORGANIZATION" ROLE="CUSTODIAN"><mets:name>Organic Eprints</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_oai:orgprints.org:5303_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="mods"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Optimisation of cultural practices for organic potato: effect of irrigation regimes on the development of late blight, crop yield and quality</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Jérôme</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Lambion</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Cyril</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Bertrand</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>A trial was established in 2003, in Southern France, to assess under organic farming conditions the effect of top irrigation with sprinklers on potato yield, but also to evaluate side effects on epidemics, with a focus on late blight (Phytophthora infestans L.). Two varieties, one susceptible (Charlotte) and one with a good level of resistance to late blight (Eden), have been planted. Three irrigation regimes have been applied : no irrigation [NO], reduced or optimized irrigation [OPT] and irrigation according to usual grower practice [NORM]. Irrigation had no effect on foliar late blight development. For both varieties, commercial yield in the non-irrigated plots was significantly lower (16,36 t.ha-1) than in the OPT and NORM plots (resp. 26,12 t.ha-1 and 24,15 t.ha-1), with a higher proportion of small tubers for NO (11,96%) than for OPT and NORM (resp. 4,25% and 3,32%). Irrigation regime had no effect on proportion of tubers with affected by either late blight or Rhizoctonia (black scurf). As expected, Charlotte confirmed its susceptibility to foliar late blight, while Eden had a significant higher total yield than Charlotte (resp. 47,19 t.ha-1 and 32,19 t.ha-1). However, there was no significant difference between the two varieties for commercial yield (resp. 20,51 t.ha-1 and 23,91 t.ha-1), due to a large proportion of tubers with black scurf and of mis-shaped tubers in Eden. For conclusion, irrigation in this region is necessary to obtain reasonable yields and tuber sizes compatible with market requirements. It is possible to reduce irrigation doses without reducing significantly yields, in order to preserve water resources. Under the conditions of this trial, top irrigation on foliage did not increase late blight or silver scurf severity.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Crop health, quality, protection</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc"> Air and water emissions</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2005</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Conference paper, poster, etc. </mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_oai:orgprints.org:5303"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_oai:orgprints.org:5303_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="mods"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>Deposit Agreement</strong></p> 
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">In depositing this eprint (a collection of files and associated bibliographic 
metadata), I grant Organic Eprints the right to make 
it permanently available on-line, with open access to all or in accordance 
with any access restrictions that I have specified. (Removal of eprints from the 
public archive is strongly discouraged, but will be granted upon request.)<br /> 
I understand that Organic Eprints does not assume any responsibility 
if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these 
files or metadata.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own first author:</strong> 
I declare that this eprint is my own intellectual property and that I have 
the right to make it available in Organic Eprints in the manner chosen.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its first
author:</strong> I declare that I have gained the proper permissions
from someone with the right to make this eprint available in Organic Eprints 
in the manner chosen - or that the material is in the public domain.</p>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these 
terms. If you do not wish to deposit the eprint right now you can 
<a href="http://orgprints.org/perl/users/myhome">return to your user area</a>, where you will find 
this eprint in your workspace. You can then later edit, clone and deposit it.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec><mets:fileGrp USE="reference"><mets:file SIZE="269457" ID="oai:orgprints.org:5303_4657_1" MIMETYPE="application/octet-stream" OWNERID="http://orgprints.org/5303/1/5303.pdf"><mets:FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" xlink:href="http://orgprints.org/5303/1/5303.pdf" xlink:type="simple"></mets:FLocat></mets:file></mets:fileGrp></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div DMDID="DMD_oai:orgprints.org:5303_mods" AMDID="TMD_oai:orgprints.org:5303"><mets:fptr FILEID="oai:orgprints.org:5303_4657_1"></mets:fptr></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>