  <eprint id="http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/2809" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>2809</eprintid>
    <rev_number>1</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>1731</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/28/09</dir>
    <datestamp>2004-06-14</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2009-08-20 14:23:01</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2009-08-20 14:23:01</status_changed>
    <type>journalp</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <doclang>en</doclang>
    <projects>
      <item>ch-fibl-international</item>
      <item>int_ifoam</item>
    </projects>
    <refereed>never</refereed>
    <budget>0</budget>
    <altloc>
      <item>http://www.fibl.org</item>
      <item>http://www.organicstandard.com/</item>
      <item>http://www.oeko-regelungen.de</item>
    </altloc>
    <publicfulltext>TRUE</publicfulltext>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Huber</family>
          <given>Beate</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011)</title>
    <ispublished>pub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>regulation</item>
      <item>6values</item>
    </subjects>
    <keywords>Akkreditierung, Internationale Zusammenarbeit, IFOAM</keywords>
    <abstract>The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011. &#13;
The comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing. &#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.</abstract>
    <date>2003</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <publication>The Organic Standard</publication>
    <number>30</number>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <pagerange>1-2</pagerange>
    <documents>
      <document id="http://orgprints.org/id/document/3013" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>3013</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>2809</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>huber-2003-accreditation.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>huber-2003-accreditation.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>167882</filesize>
            <url>http://orgprints.org/2809/1/huber-2003-accreditation.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
