<mods:mods version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011)</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Beate</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Huber</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011. &#13;
The comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing. &#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc"> Regulation</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc"> Values, standards and certification</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2003</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Journal paper</mods:genre></mods:mods>