<didl:DIDL xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS 
			 http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didmodel.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:didl="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS"><didl:Item><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/2809/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011)</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Huber, Beate</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject> Regulation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject> Values, standards and certification</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011. &#13;
The comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing. &#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Journal paper</dc:type>
        <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://orgprints.org/2809/1/huber-2003-accreditation.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>Huber, Beate (2003) Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011). The Organic Standard (30), pp. 1-2.</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://orgprints.org/2809/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Component><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/2809/1/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Resource ref="http://orgprints.org/2809/1/huber-2003-accreditation.pdf"></didl:Resource></didl:Component></didl:Item></didl:DIDL>