title: Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011)
creator: Huber, Beate
subject:  Regulation
subject:  Values, standards and certification
description: The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011.   The comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing.     On the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.
date: 2003
type: Journal paper
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: application/pdf
identifier: http://orgprints.org/2809/1/huber-2003-accreditation.pdf
identifier: Huber, Beate (2003) Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011). The Organic Standard (30), pp. 1-2.
relation: http://orgprints.org/2809/