<ctx:context-object timestamp="2009-08-20T14:23:01Z" xsi:schemaLocation="info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx http://www.openurl.info/registry/docs/info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XML" xmlns:ctx="info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:ctx"><ctx:referent><ctx:identifier>info:oai:orgprints.org:2809</ctx:identifier><ctx:metadata-by-val><ctx:format>info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:oai_dc</ctx:format><ctx:metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011)</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Huber, Beate</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject> Regulation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject> Values, standards and certification</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011. &#13;
The comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing. &#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Journal paper</dc:type>
        <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://orgprints.org/2809/1/huber-2003-accreditation.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>Huber, Beate (2003) Comparison between two accreditation criteria: A report on the differences between the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011). The Organic Standard (30), pp. 1-2.</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://orgprints.org/2809/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></ctx:metadata></ctx:metadata-by-val></ctx:referent></ctx:context-object>