?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Comparison+between+two+accreditation+criteria%3A+A+report+on+the+differences+between+the+IFOAM+Accreditation+Criteria+and+ISO+65+(EN+45011)&rft.creator=Huber%2C+Beate&rft.subject=+Regulation&rft.subject=+Values%2C+standards+and+certification&rft.description=The+paper+describes+the+results+of+a+comparison+between+two+accreditation+criteria%3A+the+IFOAM+Accreditation+Criteria+and+ISO+65+(EN+45011.+%0D%0AThe+comparison+does+not+provide+an+assessment+of+each+norm%2C+and+the+format+of+the+comparison+makes+it+difficult+to+make+a+quick+overview+on+the+major+differences.+In+addition%2C+a+summary+and+an+assessment+of+the+variations+of+both+norms+are+missing.+%0D%0A%0D%0AOn+the+other+hand%2C+the+comparison+enables+the+reader+to+make+their+own+assessment+and+as+such+will+be+a+valuable+tool+in+the+discussion+and+negotiations+about+recognition+of+IFOAM+Accreditation.&rft.date=2003&rft.type=Journal+paper&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Forgprints.org%2F2809%2F1%2Fhuber-2003-accreditation.pdf&rft.identifier=Huber%2C+Beate+(2003)+Comparison+between+two+accreditation+criteria%3A+A+report+on+the+differences+between+the+IFOAM+Accreditation+Criteria+and+ISO+65+(EN+45011).+The+Organic+Standard+(30)%2C+pp.+1-2.&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Forgprints.org%2F2809%2F