<didl:DIDL xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS 
			 http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didmodel.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:didl="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS"><didl:Item><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/1895/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Vergleichende Qualitätsforschung - Neue Ansätze und Impulse täten gut</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Alföldi, Thomas</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Bickel, Regula</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Weibel, Franco</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject> Food security, food quality and human health</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>Eine am FiBL durchgeführte Auswertung neuer Studien im Bereich der vergleichenden Qualitätsforschung brachte die Bestätigung bekannter Befunde und Tendenzen, zeigte aber keine grundsätzlich neuen Ansätze.&#13;
&#13;
Für den biologischen Landbau bleibt die Qualitätsforschung von zentraler Bedeutung.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Journal paper</dc:type>
        <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://orgprints.org/1895/3/alfoeldi-et-al-2001-qualitaet.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://orgprints.org/1895/4/alfoeldi-et-al-2001-literatur-qualitaetsbeitrag.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>Alföldi, Thomas; Bickel, Regula and Weibel, Franco (2001) Vergleichende Qualitätsforschung - Neue Ansätze und Impulse täten gut. [Comparative studies on quality - New impulses are needed.] Ökologie &amp; Landbau (117), pp. 11-13.</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://orgprints.org/1895/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Component><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/1895/3/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Resource ref="http://orgprints.org/1895/3/alfoeldi-et-al-2001-qualitaet.pdf"></didl:Resource></didl:Component><didl:Component><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/1895/4/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Resource ref="http://orgprints.org/1895/4/alfoeldi-et-al-2001-literatur-qualitaetsbeitrag.pdf"></didl:Resource></didl:Component></didl:Item></didl:DIDL>