  <eprint id="http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/14308" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>14308</eprintid>
    <rev_number>1</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>5679</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/01/43/08</dir>
    <datestamp>2009-04-15</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2009-08-20 14:40:40</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2009-08-20 14:40:40</status_changed>
    <type>conference_item</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <item_issues_count>0</item_issues_count>
    <doclang>de</doclang>
    <publishedas>Dieser Beitrag ist im Tagungsband der 10. Wissenschaftagung erschienen: &#13;
Mayer, J.; Alföldi, T.; Leiber, F.; Dubois, D.; Fried, P.; Heckendorn, F.; Hillmann, E.; Klocke, P.; Lüscher, A.; Riedel, S.; Stolze, M.; Strasser, F.; van der Heijden, M. and Willer, H., (Hrsg.) (2009) Werte – Wege – Wirkungen: Biolandbau im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ernährungssicherung, Markt und Klimawandel. Beiträge zur 10. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, Zürich, 11.-13. Februar 2009. &#13;
Band 1: Boden, Pflanzenbau, Agrartechnik, Umwelt- und Naturschutz, Biolandbau international, Wissensmanagement &#13;
Band 2: Tierhaltung, Agrarpolitik und Betriebswirtschaft, Märkte und Lebensmittel. &#13;
Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin. &#13;
Der Tagungsband kann beim Verlag Dr. Köster bezogen werden; siehe http://www.verlag-koester.de/buch.php?id=645&amp;start=0&amp;fb_id=37</publishedas>
    <projects>
      <item>int_conf_2009_wita_6_international</item>
      <item>ch-fibl-international</item>
    </projects>
    <confdates>10.-13. Februar 2009</confdates>
    <conference>10. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau</conference>
    <confloc>ETH Zürich, Schweiz</confloc>
    <refereed>yes</refereed>
    <budget>0</budget>
    <docurl>ftp://ftp.fao.org/paia/organicag/ofs/OFS-2007-1.pdf</docurl>
    <altloc>
      <item>http://www.wissenschaftstagung.de/</item>
      <item>http://www.verlag-koester.de/buch.php?id=645&amp;start=0&amp;fb_id=37</item>
    </altloc>
    <publicfulltext>TRUE</publicfulltext>
    <presentationtype>paper</presentationtype>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Zundel</family>
          <given>C.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Musyoka</family>
          <given>M.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Baruah</family>
          <given>R.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Kilcher</family>
          <given>L.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Muriuki</family>
          <given>A.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Vanlauwe</family>
          <given>B.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Chabi-Olaye</family>
          <given>A.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Mucheru</family>
          <given>M.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Mäder</family>
          <given>P.</given>
        </name>
        <id></id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>Langzeit-Systemvergleiche in Kenia und Indien: Konventionelle&#13;
und biologische Erträge aus dem ersten Umstellungsjahr</title>
    <ispublished>pub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>2security</item>
      <item>7biodiversity</item>
    </subjects>
    <keywords>Long-term experiments, production systems, tropics, crop farming</keywords>
    <abstract>Organic agriculture is more and more perceived as a promising approach to increase&#13;
food security in developing countries. However, only few attempts have been made so&#13;
far to assess agronomic and economic performance of organic agriculture in these&#13;
regions in a systematic way. This article reports the first year’s results of two long-term&#13;
farming systems comparison field trials in Kenya and India. In sub-humid Central&#13;
Kenya, on a high potential site in Meru South District (Chuka), there were no&#13;
differences between yields of conventional and organic systems for the first maize and&#13;
brassica crops. In contrast, organic yields were 14 to 60% lower than conventional&#13;
yields on a trial site in a medium potential zone in Maragua District (Thika). It is&#13;
assumed that the organic crops in Chuka could benefit from N and P mobilisation from&#13;
the soil. In Thika, where N and P were less available, the crop depended on the easily&#13;
soluble nutrients applied in the conventional treatments. In the semi-arid cotton belt of&#13;
Central India, biodynamic, organic, conventional and genetically modified (GM) cotton&#13;
are compared. Soya and wheat are also part of the crop rotation under study.&#13;
Biodynamic and organic cotton and wheat yields were 30% lower than conventional&#13;
and GM yields. Soya yields did not differ between the treatments. It is suggested that&#13;
yield in organic farming systems in conversion depends on initial inherent soil fertility&#13;
and crop.</abstract>
    <date>2009</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <documents>
      <document id="http://orgprints.org/id/document/9433" xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>9433</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>14308</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>de</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <main>Zundel_14308.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>Zundel_14308.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>47104</filesize>
            <url>http://orgprints.org/14308/1/Zundel_14308.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
