<didl:DIDL xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS 
			 http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didmodel.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:didl="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS"><didl:Item><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/14009/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Vergleich von zwei Rinderrassen hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung zur&#13;
Ökologischen Milchproduktion – Teilfrage: Tiergesundheit</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Barth, Dr. Kerstin</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Franze, Ulrike</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject> Health and welfare</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject> Breeding and genetics</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>According to the rules of organic farming, prophylaxis shall be supported by selection&#13;
of appropriate breeds. Nevertheless, today high yielding breeds predominate in organic&#13;
dairy herds. Since 2004 the Institute of Organic Farming in Trenthorst compares&#13;
two breeds under the same management conditions on its experimental farm. The&#13;
evaluation of the data gained between March 2006 and March 2008 revealed a higher&#13;
treatment rate in the milk orientated Holstein-Friesian cows compared to the German&#13;
Red Pied, a local dual purpose breed. Although treatment of claw disorders were&#13;
much more frequent in Holstein-Friesian cows, the lameness scoring carried out every&#13;
fortnight did not show any difference between the two breeds (Chi2&#13;
3=3.506, n. s.). In&#13;
24 of 134 cases, cows needed support during calving but the frequency did not differ&#13;
between the groups (Chi2&#13;
2=0.125, n. s.). Due to the low cell frequency the reasons for&#13;
culling could not be evaluated, yet. Even if a comparison of breeds has to take into&#13;
account the genotype-environment-interactions, these first results show no clear&#13;
advantage of an assumed robust breed under the conditions of our organic farm.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Conference paper, poster, etc. </dc:type>
        <dc:type>NonPeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://orgprints.org/14009/1/Barth_14009.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>Barth, Dr. Kerstin and Franze, Ulrike (2009) Vergleich von zwei Rinderrassen hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung zur Ökologischen Milchproduktion – Teilfrage: Tiergesundheit. 10. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, Zürich, 11.-13. Februar 2009.</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://orgprints.org/14009/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Component><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS">http://orgprints.org/14009/1/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Resource ref="http://orgprints.org/14009/1/Barth_14009.pdf"></didl:Resource></didl:Component></didl:Item></didl:DIDL>