Organic Eprints frontpage
 about    browse    search    register    user area    help 

8234: A critique of methodologies for the comparison of organic and conventional farming systems

Lee, Howard and Fowler, Susan (2002) A critique of methodologies for the comparison of organic and conventional farming systems. Paper presented at UK Organic Research 2002 Conference of the Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR), Aberystwyth, 26-28 March 2002; Published in Powell, Jane and et al., , Eds. Proceedings of the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference, page pp. 281-284. Organic Centre Wales, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Summary

This paper was presented at the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference of the Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR).
A review is presented of comparative studies of organic and conventional farming systems, with a special focus upon economic criteria. The different categories of comparison methodologies are critically reviewed. Conclusions are that classic experimentation has a valuable part to play but that more qualitative assessment can also be useful and should be encouraged. Careful allowance should be made for major background differences in management when comparing financial profitability. Longer term case studies, which try to monitor organic systems in their own right, should also be encouraged.

Document Language:English
Keywords:literature review; farming systems; farm surveys, field studies; case studies; economics; methodologies; management; Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR)
Subject Areas:Knowledge management > Research methodology and philosophy
Farming Systems
Farming Systems > Farm economics
Research affiliation: UK
UK > Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR) > COR 2002
UK > Other organizations
UK > Univ. Aberystwyth > Organic Centre Wales (OCW)
UK > Univ. Aberystwyth > Institute of Rural Sciences (IRS)
Total budget (Euro):0
Orgprints ID Number:8234
Contact:OCW,
Deposited On:28 April 2006
EPrint Type:Conference paper
Published?:Published
Peer Review Status:Not peer-reviewed
Related Links:http://orgprints.org/6775/

Archive Staff Only: edit this record