Organic Eprints frontpage
 about    browse    search    register    user area    help 

1295: Discrimination of semi-natural plant communities from abandoned fields by ordination and neural networks

Ejrnæs, Rasmus; Liira, Jaan and Poulsen, Roar (2003) Discrimination of semi-natural plant communities from abandoned fields by ordination and neural networks. Applied Vegetation Science.**

Full text available as:
PDF - [Depositor and staff only] - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Summary

This study deals with the succession from abandoned fields to semi-natural grassland and heathland vegetation and the discrimination between these types of habitat.
We hypothesised that semi-natural condition may be indicated by the species composition of vascular plants. A statistical classification model was developed, based on 2059 reference samples from Danish ancient grasslands and heathlands, and abandoned fields of varying age. This Succession Model was shown to discriminate effectively between abandoned fields and semi-natural habitats, and was suggested to be useful for the detection of conservation-worthy abandoned fields. A test of four hypotheses regarding the model prediction of naturalness of abandoned fields revealed that successional age, period of abandonment and successional trajectory had significant impact on the naturalness of abandoned fields. The implications of the results for restoration of semi-natural habitats and the usefulness of the model in practical conservation management are discussed.

Document Language:English
Keywords:Artificial neural networks, biodiversity, conservation, habitat quality, old field, restoration, secondary succession, set-aside, supervised classification
Subject Areas: Environmental aspects > Biodiversity and ecosystem services
Research affiliation: Denmark > DARCOF II (2000-2005) > III.5 Nature quality in organic farming
Funding Part:5-25%
Orgprints ID Number:1295
Contact:Ejrnæs, senior scientist Rasmus
Deposited On:23 September 2003
EPrint Type:Journal paper
Published?:Unpublished
Peer Review Status:Submitted for peer-review but not yet accepted
Additional Publishing Information:Submitted for peer review in Applied Vegetation Science June 2003

Archive Staff Only: edit this record