11412: The ecological footprint method on a farm level – a case study on a UK organic farm with parallel cropping
(2008) The ecological footprint method on a farm level – a case study on a UK organic farm with parallel cropping. Working Paper, HRDA Garden Organic.
Full text available as: |
Summary
There is increasing interest in the farming community to understand and improve their ecological footprint and reduce CO2-carbon emissions. This case study compares the ecological footprint of organic and conventional cabbage, celeriac, sugar beet and winter wheat crops on a UK commercial, parallel cropping, farm. Results show lower ecological footprints and energy ratios in all organic crops. However, CO2-emissions per unit yield are only lower if the fertility building is not considered. Including energy use for fertility building and reducing yields in proportion to the fertility area brings CO2-emissions per unit yield level with conventional. It is concluded that in order to improve their ecological footprint organic farming needs to improve yield levels and make better use of the fertility area by using it as biogas for energy production, growing main crop legumes or using only short-term fertility building.
| Document Language: | English |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | ecological footprint, energy use, CO2 emissions, organic farming |
| Subject Areas: | Environmental aspects Knowledge management > Research methodology and philosophy > Specific methods > Indicators and other value-laden measures Crop husbandry > Production systems > Vegetables Crop husbandry Food systems > Recycling, balancing and resource management Environmental aspects > Air and water emissions Farming Systems > Farm economics |
| Research affiliation: | UK > Henry Doubleday Research Association (HDRA ) |
| Total budget (Euro): | 0 |
| Orgprints ID Number: | 11412 |
| Contact: | Schmutz, Dr Ulrich |
| Deposited On: | 03 March 2008 |
| EPrint Type: | Working paper |
| Published?: | Unpublished |
| Type of presentation: | Paper |
| Peer Review Status: | Not peer-reviewed |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record



