Organic Eprints frontpage
 about    browse    search    register    user area    help 

11412: The ecological footprint method on a farm level – a case study on a UK organic farm with parallel cropping

Schmutz, Dr Ulrich; Firth, Mr Chris; Lewis, Mr Kevin and Lillywhite, Mr Robert (2008) The ecological footprint method on a farm level – a case study on a UK organic farm with parallel cropping. Working Paper, HRDA Garden Organic.

Full text available as:
Other (MS Word) - [Registered users only]

Summary

There is increasing interest in the farming community to understand and improve their ecological footprint and reduce CO2-carbon emissions. This case study compares the ecological footprint of organic and conventional cabbage, celeriac, sugar beet and winter wheat crops on a UK commercial, parallel cropping, farm. Results show lower ecological footprints and energy ratios in all organic crops. However, CO2-emissions per unit yield are only lower if the fertility building is not considered. Including energy use for fertility building and reducing yields in proportion to the fertility area brings CO2-emissions per unit yield level with conventional. It is concluded that in order to improve their ecological footprint organic farming needs to improve yield levels and make better use of the fertility area by using it as biogas for energy production, growing main crop legumes or using only short-term fertility building.

Document Language:English
Keywords:ecological footprint, energy use, CO2 emissions, organic farming
Subject Areas: Environmental aspects
Knowledge management > Research methodology and philosophy > Specific methods > Indicators and other value-laden measures
Crop husbandry > Production systems > Vegetables
Crop husbandry
Food systems > Recycling, balancing and resource management
Environmental aspects > Air and water emissions
Farming Systems > Farm economics
Research affiliation: UK > Henry Doubleday Research Association (HDRA )
Total budget (Euro):0
Orgprints ID Number:11412
Contact:Schmutz, Dr Ulrich
Deposited On:03 March 2008
EPrint Type:Working paper
Published?:Unpublished
Type of presentation:Paper
Peer Review Status:Not peer-reviewed

Archive Staff Only: edit this record